Monday 17 March 2014


StarPlus tools for learning - more than a library catalogue!

StarPlus is now established as the University Library resource discovery service and catalogue, providing access to digital and print resources in the Library and beyond. StarPlus also includes a number of tools to support collaborative learning and resource sharing, as well as enabling individuals to organise and personalise content they discover.
This seems to be a good time to be promoting these tools, in the light of the recent NMC Horizon Report 2014 Higher Education which identifies the growing ubiquity of social media as one of the key trends accelerating technology adoption in HE.


Individual learners can add favourite items on StarPlus to their personal e-Shelf. These can then be organised into folders, printed, emailed or added to reference management software. It’s also possible to add notes to individual items or folders.



This functionality can support undergraduates as they begin to develop the key research skills of selecting, evaluating and organising scholarly material for coursework and research projects.

   
It’s possible to add tags, reviews and ratings to all items on StarPlus. These will be visible to other users, and are a means of enabling collaboration and sharing in resource discovery. Facebook users can use the Like button to tell their followers about something they’ve found on StarPlus.


If you have a look at the popular tags on StarPlus at the moment, you’ll see that some users have started to use module codes as tags. 
at the moment, you’ll see that some users have started to use module codes as tags. 

 

My colleague Clare Scott and I recently talked to Gary Wood from the School of English, and he is encouraging his students on ELL326 to try tagging, reviews and the e-Shelf.  In addition, Farzana suggested using the text for the tagged records to create a wordcloud and she has been working with Gary to integrate this into MOLE. Hopefully we’ll be able to get feedback from Gary and his students as the semester progresses. 

If you can see potential uses for learning and teaching in your department, please give it a go. You’ll see a link to StarPlus on your Services menu in MUSE, and before you get started, remember that to access these tools, you must sign in to StarPlus by clicking the link marked University members in the top right corner. To find out more about using StarPlus effectively, have a look at the guide in the Information Skills Resource We’d love to hear how you get on!



Life on the front-line with the Learning Technologies Team Support Desk


Spring has sprung
Phew - got through it - the ever busy start of a new semester is behind us (just).
The Spring semester brings different problems than the Autumn. September brings a new influx of students and a number of new staff with no knowledge of MOLE.  By February things have settled down and MOLE newbies are a little more comfortable using the software.  And just when you think the dust has settled….many students decide to stir things up a little and change courses.  No problem - this is an automated affair via the ‘Add/Drop’ process which updates a student’s registration record which in turn fires through the changes to MOLE and gives the students access to their new courses.  Only sometimes things don’t go quite to plan and we have just had one such occasion. Lots of students contacted us to ask why their changes were not reflected in MOLE.  We ended up adding them manually to their new courses and hopefully not many were inconvenienced for very long. Investigations showed that a problem with the computer script designed to run the automated process was causing a blip and this was then quickly rectified.

Removing Students from Courses?
Talking of adding students to courses, we are often asked why Course Instructors can add but not remove them from their courses. The reason is that removing a student from a course also removes the students’ submitted work from that course and this is irreversible. Simply re-adding the student does not retrieve their work and so deleting a student in error could be potentially disastrous. To avoid this situation, the facility to remove students has been disabled to Course Instructors. Instead, they should either change the status of the student to 'Unavailable' or send a request to us to remove the student on their behalf - but only if it’s absolutely certain no work has been submitted or that any submitted work is no longer required. This situation also applies where Course Instructors have accidentally added other staff members as students rather than an intended teaching role.

Internet Explorer 11
If you use IE11 to access MOLE, you may have been experiencing problems just recently where a message appears on screen saying IE11 is no longer working and you come to a crashing halt.  This has been caused by a Microsoft update issued in the middle of February which MOLE doesn't seem to like.  Earlier versions of Internet Explorer are not affected. Blackboard are aware of this and are working on a fix but in the meantime it may be better to use a different web browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox when accessing MOLE.

Other known issues
MOLE Performance
Following some hardware changes, the problems we experienced for several weeks at the end of 2013 have so far not resurfaced on the same scale in 2014.  However we are not complacent and ask that if you do encounter any MOLE slowness, please let us know immediately and remember to tell us which MOLE server you are connected to (this is displayed on the top of every MOLE page)  as this will help us to identify the cause of the problem.  Contact us at mole@sheffield.ac.uk





Friday 14 March 2014

GALT: Collating Learning Materials with Google Forms for Student Self-Assessment Workshop


Exchange of Ideas (CC0 Public Domain image)
Introduction

As mentioned in the initial post about GALT Sheffield, the afternoon was split into a set of parallel workshops. I attended the "Collating Learning Materials with Google Forms for Student Self-Assessment Workshop" facilitated by Mel Lindley from Sheffield Hallam University. This was a complete workshop, whereas some of the others were split down into mutli-workshops which involved a series of topics facilitated by different people.

Mel introduce the workshop by presenting some of her background and how her interest had developed in using technology enhanced learning within her own practice.


A module that she delivered was primarily based on workbooks produced in Microsoft Word. The topic covered cardio-respiratory physiotherapy. This was the area in which students received the least clinical experience. Focus groups were run to canvass student opinion. The results showed that students wanted learning materials that they could return to and they wanted it to be more visual.


Mel worked on the concept of producing content as videos rather than as a workbook. She applied the functionality of TED-Ed to enable this.


[Aside:


TED-Ed Website http://ed.ted.com/




Aside End]


TED-Ed videos were created using the help of enthusiastic student volunteers. So there was a mixture of videos, ones in which Mel herself appeared and ones with just students. And in order to pull all the content together, Mel used Google Sites to provide the structure.


At the end of the first year of running the module using this new format, an evaluation took place. The outcome was that students really like the approach. They were able to watch the material anywhere, for example during journey time when they were on clinical placement. Of the videos, the students tended to prefered the student based ones. So more of these were produced.


Mel published the materials so that it was openly viewable. This had a real benefit because within 24 hours of going live, a major multinational company was in contact wanting to collaborate.


Using Google Sites meant that it was easy to edit and change the information without technical support. It is great for collating resources and it delivers content in a mobile device friendly format, which is important for students on placement. The site was linked into the VLE, but students could also get to it without going via the VLE.


To give an idea of the time commitment involved, Mel produced 12 TED-Eds and two Google Sites in one long working day.


Students like to collaborate, and it is an important skill for them to develop. With the TED-Ed service only the person who is logged in is able to input and save answers, so that collaboration functionality isn’t really there yet. However, this is something that TED-Ed has been made aware of and they are looking to develop this functionality.


This work received a formal commendation from the national professional body for its content and delivery. Also, from an enhanced employability perspective, students were able to demonstrate their involvement in the production of learning materials.


Mel would like to develop the concept further to a point where students could edit content in a Google Site. Currently they just had collaboration options via Google Docs.


A separate area where Mel developed a similar approach was for a Distance Learning (DL) course. There were certain misconceptions about the course held by students in some other countries. Consequently, a Google Site was used to create a taster event.  Videos of patients were hosted on YouTube with appropriate consent forms saying that they would be publicly viewable. Students were required to fill in Google Docs to explain the gait of the patient subject on the video. This proved to very successful.

Perspectives on the Workshop



There was a range of abilities of participants within the workshop. Mel negotiated with the capacity audience to identify what people wanted covering within the session. There were several Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) staff in the workshop, so Mel said that it would be useful for people to jump in if they had extra knowledge to contribute. As a result people felt free to contribute and interact with the whole group and also help out the people sitting alongside with less Google Apps knowledge. It was a really nice atmosphere in the workshop and it showed the potential of such a shared institutional event.


Mel started out looking at creating a Google Doc, which some people in the workshop didn’t know how to do. She then went on to demonstrating how to create a Google Form. Emphasise was placed upon thinking about the purpose of the form before getting started creating. It can be important to think about even whether to ask for a Name in the form as this could lead to a reduced number of responses over an anonymous form. She ran through the process of creating a series of questions, explaining the different types and when you might use them. She explained how it was possible to set up a likert scale, using columns to make the scale and, therefore, not having to type in Strongly Agree, Agree, etc. every time. [Tip: Google Chrome auto spell-checks on form creation, other browsers might not.]


A limitation of the form is if you make an error and go in and change it then the question drops to the bottom. You can re-order the questions, but these won’t correspond to the order in the spreadsheet. To get around this you need to make a copy of the form and then create a new spreadsheet to realign everything.


There was a test form for the group to complete. And a set of graphs resulted from the inputs to shows the responses. The file can be downloaded as a spreadsheet with all the responses in.

Session time was getting on so we moved onto a demo of how to create a Google Sites. [Tip: Look at different templates and click the edit button to see how things are put together to give you some ideas.]


There was a lot of useful information exchanged, and good discussion and sharing took place throughout the workshop session. 


Mel suggested some really useful general advice during the session. Two which I felt to be good lines to take away were:


  • “Don’t take risks on your own; work with others within and external to the university.”
  • “Roll your sleeves up, have a play and get your hands dirty actually using the technology.”

Related GALT blogposts:


Google Apps for Learning and Teaching (GALT): Sheffield One Day Conference 
Google Apps for Learning and Teaching (GALT): Morning Session 2

GALT Website link




Thursday 13 March 2014

Google Apps for Learning and Teaching (GALT): Morning Session 2


Exchange of Ideas (CC0 Public Domain image)

 

1 Google Hangouts for Under- and Post-graduate Distance Learning Students

Sue Beckingham (SHU)


This work spanned two ends of the spectrum, a first year undergraduates course and postgraduates MBA course.


With Google Hangouts up to nine other people can join you in the discussion. If you make it a Public Hangouts then even more people can watch, but they still can’t participate. For an Invited Hangout you need the name and email address of participants and they have to have a Google+ account.


On the MBA course engagement wasn’t happening in the VLE discussions, so Google Hangouts were tried. There was a desire to provide some form of scaffolding to the learners and Hangouts would emulate a face-to-face experience.


Support was key to the experience. There was therefore a needed to familiarize the students with Google Hangouts beforehand.


Each of the sessions was recorded using Screen-o-matic online screencasting service.


The student feedback from the course:


  • the scaffolding was important to them,
  • they appreciated learning these new tools/technologies,
  • they enjoyed interacting with other students,
  • the students feeding back on each others’ work was very useful.


On the undergraduate course, students weren’t getting the jobs that they wanted because they didn’t have the necessary skills. A programme was developed to hold online meetings for the students to facilitate using Google Hangouts. These sessions were recorded so that the students could review them. This gave the students new digital skills. It also allowed them to reflect upon their experience. Additionally, they were developing professional skills around managing meetings, developing a more professional persona and increasing their communication skills. This needs to be an ongoing process where students continue to learn professional and digital skills from their first year and onwards throughout their undergraduate educational journey.


Someone in the audience asked why Google Hangouts should be used in preference to using Skype. Basically, the answer was that Skype costs money to have multiple users. Also Hangouts integrates well with Docs.


2 Talking and Not Talking: Google Hangouts in Blended Learning

Tim Herrick (UoS)


Again this was a case of two stories, one undergraduate and the other postgraduate. Tim said that one of these was successful in using Google Hangouts whilst the other proved less so.


The undergraduate course was at level one in semester one for about 35 students. The teaching involved two hours per week of seminar time, plus one additional hour of office time. The office hour was scheduled for a different day from the rest of contact time, and there was no other reason for the students to come into the university on that day. Also, Tim notice that the students were all tending to be asking the same kind of questions.


So Google Hangouts was introduced as a way to get the student interaction and to reduce redundancy. It wasn’t compulsory. No one “hung out” with Tim. Probable reasons for this were as follows.


  • It wasn’t a good fit for the course; the course was about study skills, not learning technology.
  • Just because students had the technology, it didn’t mean that they would have the skills to use it.
  • It was optional, so what was the compelling reason for them to get involved?
  • It wasn’t embedded in the course from the outset, instead it came as an add-on later in the course.


The other course in which Tim used Google Hangouts was a postgraduate taught course on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, which had eight students enrolled. As the subject area was all about learning technologies it worked much better. The sessions were two and a half hours long. There was a one hour Hangout followed by a face-to-face discussion session in the School of Education. This gave the students exposure to a technology that they might be going to use themselves.


The advantages to the use of Hangouts in this course were:
  • that the students already had a rich set of skills on which to draw,
  • they were interested and confident in experimentation,
  • they knew that they could ask for help and felt confident in doing so,
  • the Hangout element was in the timetable from the start of the course and was therefore seen as an integral part.


Tim gave us his wisdom from this experience. He felt that any use of technology needs to fit with what you are wanting the learning outcomes to be from the course. It is important to spend time on getting people interested in the idea first before approaching the technology.


Tim felt that Google’s thinking behind Hangouts is that it is more of an informal process. It is more about being online and ‘hooking up’ to have a discussion, not so formal. Students liked this idea of greater informality.


3 Using Google Forms to Capture Student Module Feedback

Simon Warwick (SHU)


In the Sheffield Business School at SHU there is a process once a year where students sit down with module leaders and course reps and discuss the course to see how it can be improved. This was very time intensive as a process usually taking over 3 or 4 weeks in total. This was reviewed to look at how the process could be more efficient for both staff and students. Initial trials use Evernote, but this meant ending with a big unwieldy documents that then had to be broken up. This was unsatisfactory. Consequently, they went on to Google Forms with a spreadsheet backend. This speeded up the system. Students could see when they had made an entry and the administration was much less involved.


Nexus tablets were used because of the ease of transporting and because of the integration with Google Apps would be better. There was a problem that the wi-fi kept dropping out. Also student reps had problems speaking and typing at the same time so it was difficult for them to be involved in the discussion and capture it via notes. This is an area that needs more thinking about to enable the technology to be used more effectively.


Other uses that Simon suggested for the Forms approach included:


  • Dissertation topic selection
  • Modules option selection
  • Formative quizzes - marking with feedback, very quick to use
  • Questionnaires
  • Attendance monitoring - QR Codes takes student directly to a form that they can fill in
  • Help / support requests - embedded into a site to allow appropriate support materials to be created.
  • Booking forms


4 Improving your workflow with Google Drive

David Read (UoS)


Similar to Simon, David was looking at a particular workflow issue that needed some improvement. It was for a popular business summer school that employed a number of course teachers each year. All the teachers need to be observed to ensure standardization. Because of the different localities of the teachers and observers it was proving difficult to set up and organize observation sessions.


So to deal more efficiently with the administration, David used a spreadsheet and implemented  a Google script called FormMule. While this sounds complicated it is actually really easy to setup and use. It allows personalized template to be emailed out to everyone. So in David’s usage example it included the names of observers and teaching times, etc. This then gives a personalized email with all the relevant information.


AutoCrat is another script. Set up a template for an observation form and AutoCrat sends out a personalized Google document for them to fill in. These went into a shared folder in Google Drive so that all teachers/observers could access. David thought that there might be some confusion with the process, but those kinds of problems didn’t arise.


This workflow made the process of observing and creating the feedback much easier and more rapid. Whilst David’s is a specific use, there is a great range of generic possibilities for using these and other scripts.


Some questions and feedback from the audience included the following. It is very important to use a student’s name. Also this process can be used to email out marks.


How secure are the scripts?
David thought that they have been vetted by Google so should be secure. Additionally, you have to authorise to allow them to be used.


5 Using Youtube to Capture Student Reflections

Natalie Wilmot, Diane Rushton, Andrew Middleton (SHU)


Andrew explained about this piece of Action Research has been carried out for about six years.


It uses YouTube to hear the student voice.


The emphasis of the work seemed to be on the students thinking reflectively. They needed to be asking themselves what the learning meant for them. As a result, students were required to create a weekly reflective thought in pairs.


Andrew was interested in the metaphysical aspect of the work. This raise such significant questions for the students to think about as “What is the reason for being at university?”


Technology was use within the study because it was ubiquitous, and offered familiarity and simplicity to the students.


Andrew outlined what they did with the students.
  • Ran 2 hour workshops (tutor led)
  • Role of reflection in the module
  • Reflection method - spoken peer support which was then captured


There was evidence from students after the course ran about the benefit from the process of talking together using public performance.


It was fair to say that some students got it, but others just didn’t get it at all. Out of class they didn’t feel motivated. The technology was easy to pick up. The workshops were busy, exciting and productive. But on the whole the students hadn’t bought into the experience.


Reference:
“The End of Education: Redefining the Value of School” (1996), Neil Postman, Vintage Books


6 Running a Professional Development Initiative with Sites, Youtube, Calendar and Drive

Andy Tattersall (UoS)


Andy talked about three areas he has worked on that required the development of Google Sites:
  • 3 eLeaning
  • Minute Mendeley
  • ScHARR Bite Size


Andy showed where he felt Google Sites fitted into a ‘Learning Curve’ of how easy it is to get started with. To some extent using Google Sites is an extension of a skills set developed from other Google Apps services. In comparison to learning HTML coding or a more substantive website creation software alternative, Google Sites is much more intuitive for people to get started with and there isn’t a large revision time if you haven’t used it for a while, unlike some of the other solutions.


The 3 eLearning site was developed for NHS Clinicians to access. It is easy to look at on a tablet or other mobile device and has lots of videos hosted on YouTube.


Bite Size are 20 minutes long presentations/discussion that introduce people to a particular topic. They have been running for four years. A Site was set up with videos, a calendar for dates, etc. and branded to The University of Sheffield. Andy uses Google Events to get people to come, sign up is via Google+. He also uses a blog as a further way to promote Bite Size. He says that it is good to use a presence that crops up in other places. He used Google Forms to get feedback and evaluate Bite Size to enable enhancements to be made.


Andy wrote an academic paper about ScHARR Bite Size with two other colleagues. They did this using a Google Doc. They arrange to work on it together on a weekly basis. This made the process much more efficient and it took a total of about 10 hours to complete.

Minute Mendeley is a Google Sites used to bring together one minute video resources that help people to use the Mendeley reference management software. It was quick and easy to set up and it is very mobile friendly.